During a panel at a fantasy convention Peter Straub
turned to me and said, “I know you! You’re New Genre.” I moderated the panel.
The subject was… oh I don’t remember. We were in the largest ballroom and it was packed with other weirdoes. Straub
sparkles at these conventions.
Typically, the “pros” who end up on panels never prepare, but rely on wit they lack. Retread jokes. When I used to attend conventions, whenever I was asked to participate on a panel, I prepared, often well in advance. People pay sometimes hundreds of dollars for travel and admission. It’s rude not to prepare. It’s arrogant.
Typically, the “pros” who end up on panels never prepare, but rely on wit they lack. Retread jokes. When I used to attend conventions, whenever I was asked to participate on a panel, I prepared, often well in advance. People pay sometimes hundreds of dollars for travel and admission. It’s rude not to prepare. It’s arrogant.
In 2001, at a convention held in Manhattan, I
attended a panel about vampire lit. The assholes on stage knew nothing. Straub,
who was in the audience, raised his hand, ostensibly to make a small point, but
actually to rescue the idiot panelists. He shared insights he’d had while
rereading Bram Stoker’s Dracula in preparation for writing an introduction to a
new Modern Library edition. His talk was lively and enlightening.
Afterward, I asked him if he’d write a blurb for
New Genre. He did. When I mentioned this to someone else attending the
conference, they snickered about Straub tossing out blurbs left and right, but
I remained pleased; not just to have a blurb from Straub, but by the content of
the blurb:
In speaking to the need for new forums and a greater seriousness, New Genre is extremely welcome. I support the journal whole-heartedly.
“Greater
seriousness” is exactly New Genre. For that matter, if you haven’t already
sussed, greater seriousness is a mandate I bring to horror fiction generally,
not just via New Genre. That’s what makes me such humorless fun.
I haven’t read all of Straub’s short fiction, but
all I’ve read is good. “A Short Guide to the City” is good, without much in
terms of plot or resolution. I’ve only read pieces of the book the story’s from—Houses
Without Doors. I read “Blue Rose” in Dennis Etchison’s Cutting Edge anthology,
possibly when that anthology was published in 1987, and “The Juniper
Tree” in Douglas Winter’s Prime Evil anthology. Truthfully, I’ve read very
little of Straub’s work—I look forward to it.
Ellen Datlow introduces K.W. Jeter’s “The First
Time” as “brutal,” which is a mistake, because intended or no, that’s a dare,
and inevitably my first reaction was, Well it wasn’t that brutal. I’m not saying
Datlow is wrong, mind you, but best to find out for yourself.
“The First Time” is good, a story about a young
man brought by his father, his uncle, and their friends to a brothel that
provides a very unique service. Jeter is interested in the way men are taught
to use women. Especially effective is the image of a diagram charting the parts
of a woman’s body a Christian man is allowed to touch before marriage:
One time, when they’d been alone, she’d given him a piece of paper that she’d had folded up in the back pocket of her jeans. The paper had gotten shaped round, the same shape as he butt, and he’d felt funny taking it an unfolding it…. You had to be engaged, with a ring and everything, before you could unhook her bra. He’d kept the piece of paper, tucked in one of his books at home. In a way, it’d been kind of a relief, just to know what was expected of him.
This diagram becomes a talisman of sorts, though
in the end it’s only a bitter reminder of something lost.
No comments:
Post a Comment